Evaluation Drift
Planning Baselines, Calibrated Review, and Risk-Based Monitoring
By
Tenten AI Research
ML Engineering
Published
Updated
Read time
4 min

Abstract
AI quality can change when inputs, users, reference material, models, prompts or tools change. Infrastructure uptime and latency do not describe every change in task quality. Establish an accepted-task baseline and compare later results on the dimensions that matter to the workflow.
Anthropic’s 9 January 2026 guide to agent evaluations discusses code-based, model-based and human graders, calibration and complementary monitoring. This paper applies those distinctions to an evaluation plan: representative cases, risk-based sampling, explicit alert decisions and an owner for investigation. No fixed judge-agreement percentage, sample count or monitoring cadence establishes production reliability for every system.
Summarize this page with AI
Full Content
Read the full whitepaper
Provide your details to access the guide.
Submitted details are handled under our privacy policy to provide the requested content and respond to your enquiry.
Need help accessing this whitepaper? Contact Tenten

Start with one workflow.
Agree on the next step.
Leave your contact details and question type. We will follow up by email to understand the work and discuss scope.